Candidates from both parties: Sign pledge to restore democracy in US
Dear presidential candidates:
As you seek election to the highest office of the country, we are asking you to pledge allegiance to the American people.
Our democracy is in crisis....
Dear presidential candidates:
As you seek election to the highest office of the country, we are asking you to pledge allegiance to the American people.
Our democracy is in crisis. Today, Americans have fewer protections to their right to vote than when the Voting Rights Act was passed in 1965. Never before have corporations and special interests wielded so much power at the expense of ordinary Americans.
Each one of you has the opportunity to shape a new kind of government, where we address issues on the people’s terms — not the terms of corporations and the 1 percent who are trying to buy our elections.
We want you to prove that you will work for the people by rejecting fossil fuel money and speaking up for democracy on the campaign trail, so that we know your platforms come from your conscience and not from your biggest donors. Some of you have already pledged to reject money from fossil fuels, which we applaud; some of you have yet to take that important step.
Now, we’re asking you to sign The Pledge to Fix Democracy:
The Pledge to #fixdemocracy
I pledge allegiance to a democracy of, by, and for the people.
If elected, I pledge to fight for a people-powered democracy where every voice is heard, by defending the right to vote for all, and supporting common-sense measures like public funding for campaigns and overturning Citizens United, to ensure a government by and for the people, not the biggest donors.
And I will prove that I work for the people by refusing money from fossil fuel interests and by championing these solutions for a people powered democracy on the campaign trail.
Republicans or Democrats, we can all agree that the role of the president is to represent the people. We’re asking you to protect the right to vote for all Americans and to fight for commonsense measures to make sure that every voice is heard, not every dollar. In short, we’re asking for you to join us in making America the democracy it should be.
Signed,
Greenpeace; 350.org; Center for Biological Diversity; Center for Popular Democracy; Climate Justice Alliance; Climate Parents; Common Cause; Democracy Initiative; Energy Action Coalition; Food and Water Watch; Friends of the Earth; Indigenous Environmental Network; Labor Network for Sustainability; Oil Change International; People for the American Way; Public Citizen; Rainforest Action Network; SumofUs; US Rebel Alliance; US Student Association; Colin Beavan, author of “No Impact Man” and “How to Be Alive”; Ben Cohen, co-founder of Ben & Jerry’s Ice Cream and head stamper at StampStampede.org; columnist and author Jim Hightower; Bill McKibben, co-founder of 350.org; Gus Speth, former dean, Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies.
Source: The Hill
California’s Emeryville is third city to pass Fair Workweek policy
![](/sites/default/files/newsdefault.jpg)
California’s Emeryville is third city to pass Fair Workweek policy
EMERYVILLE, Calif. – On Oct. 18, this city became the third in the nation to pass a Fair Workweek policy. The City Council passed the ordinance unanimously at its first reading, following...
EMERYVILLE, Calif. – On Oct. 18, this city became the third in the nation to pass a Fair Workweek policy. The City Council passed the ordinance unanimously at its first reading, following testimony at a pre-meeting press conference and during the meeting itself, by those most affected.
Under the new policy, employers will have to give workers their schedules two weeks in advance, compensating them for last-minute changes. When more hours become available, current workers will have priority so they can get closer to fulltime work.
The council must confirm its action with a second vote, scheduled for Nov. 1. The new law, which will affect some 4,000 fast food and retail workers, is to become effective in July 2017.
Almost two years ago, San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors passed the first such measure, the Retail Workers Bill of Rights, and just last month, Seattle followed suit http://www.peoplesworld.org/article/tale-of-two-cities-yes-vs-no-on-fair....
New York City may be next: Mayor Bill de Blasio and City Council members are pressing legislation to require employers to give some 65,000 hourly fast food workers a two week notice of changes in their shift assignments. However, the bill doesn’t extend such requirements to retail stores or full-service restaurants.
Emeryville, a small city across the Bay from San Francisco with a large concentration of retail stores, already has the country’s highest minimum wage, with large employers required to pay their workers at least $14.82 per hour. Smaller businesses must pay at least $13 per hour.
At the state level, earlier this year California passed a new minimum wage law with a path to a $15 hourly minimum.
At the press conference, low wage workers, local residents, community and labor organizations, faith leaders and academic researchers told of the many challenges faced by retail workers who must deal with constantly shifting and unpredictable schedules and variable numbers of work hours.
Moriah Larkins, an Emeryville retail worker and activist with the Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment (ACCE) who MC’d the press conference, told of her own experience working six days a week for a “bad apple” employer. “And on my days off they would call me in, and I have my son, who was two years old at the time.”
At first, Larkins said, she used to scramble and pay extra for last minute child care. But as she realized her extra hours, and less time for her son, were making him unhappy, she started refusing the extra shifts. After that, her hours, which had been 32 to 40 per week, were cut in half.
“Now,” she said, “I work for a ‘good apple.’ I work 28 hours per week, I can pay all my bills, I can spend time with my son and finish my nursing degree.”
In a conversation after the press conference, Larkins said she hoped the ordinance would pass “without exceptions.” She and others are warning that before the final vote Nov. 1, the California Retail Association is trying hard to weaken the measure.
Other retail and fast food workers described their experiences, including a past employer who paid subminimum wages and another who fired a worker after “forgetting” he had accepted her timely request for a day off.
The new ordinance has been in the making for a while. In May, Emeryville Mayor Dianne Martinez and Councilmember Ruth Atkin wrote an op-ed published by the San Francisco Chronicle, in which they said a regional fair workweek was needed to assure workers “stable schedules so they can pay the bills, live healthier lives, “and contribute more to our communities.
A recent study, Wages and Hours: Why workers in Emeryville’s service sector need a fair workweek, conducted by ACCE, the East Bay Alliance for a Sustainable Economy (EBASE), and the Center for Popular Democracy found that in a sample of more than 100 frontline Emeryville retail workers, some 68 percent had part-time schedules, 82 percent were people of color, eight out of 10 had variable schedules and nearly two-thirds only got their schedules a week or less in advance. Over two-thirds said they wanted to work more hours, while over half said they were scheduled for “clopening” shifts, or back-to-back closings and openings with less than 11 hours off.
The study concluded that employers need to commit to predictable, flexible and responsive schedules that allow for adequate rest.
At the Oct. 18 press conference, EBASE Deputy Director Jennifer Lin said, “Providing a fair work week is not only good for workers, it’s good for business, too.” With many retailers already scheduling in advance, she said, the new ordinance will help level the playing field, and stable schedules and more adequate hours also reduce turnover and absenteeism.
In an article earlier this month in The Nation magazine, author Michelle Chen noted that the Fight for $15 and Fair Workweek struggles are “converging on sectors that used to be known as bastions of dead-end jobs.” The next step, she said, is “to organize, and unionize, to give workers real collective bargaining leverage over their wages and working conditions. Work-life balance comes by shifting the power balance on the job, so that workers have the final say over when they’re on call.”
By Marilyn Bechtel
Source
Help for Immigrants
Polish Daily News - November 7, 2013 - Contrary to the defendants under the criminal justice system, people in immigration detention have no right to a lawyer from the office. As part of the New...
Polish Daily News - November 7, 2013 - Contrary to the defendants under the criminal justice system, people in immigration detention have no right to a lawyer from the office. As part of the New York Immigrant Family Unity Project about 190 immigrants in detention facing deportation, you can seek legal help.
New York immigrate Family Unity Project (NYIFUP) is an initiative that emerged from seven years of research and interviews with immigration lawyers and defenders of the rights of immigrants. They gave their opinions that the lack of a competent legal representation for many New York immigrants, unfamiliar with the law, do not have money for lawyers and having problems with the language, is unnecessary deportations, which lead to the separation of families and are an unnecessary financial ballast to the government.
Last summer, the New York city council has allocated 500 000 dollars. to fund a pilot program, whose task was to test the reasonableness of the initiative. The draft law school joined them. Benjamin N. Cardozo, and several organizations fighting for immigrant rights, and so created a program of assistance to 190 immigrants.
"It is a matter of justice - says Peter L. Markowitz, a professor at Cardozo Law School. - This is an opportunity to initiate changes in the way immigrants are treated in our country."
In the future, originator NYIFUP plan to organize legal assistance for all poor immigrants awaiting deportation in immigration detention: in New York, Batavia, NY, Newark and Elizabeth, New Jersey. Annually, these centers gets about 2,450 immigrants.
The full annual cost of the program is estimated at 7.4 million dollars. His supporters argue that reducing the time that immigrants spend in detention centers, and limit the number of deportations will bring savings of 5.9 million per year.
W przeciwieństwie do oskarżonych podlegających systemowi sądownictwa karnego, osoby przebywające w więzieniach imigracyjnych nie mają prawa do prawnika z urzędu. W ramach New York Immigrant Family Unity Project około 190 imigrantów w ośrodkach zatrzymań, którym grozi deportacja, skorzystać może z pomocy prawnej.New York Immigrat Family Unity Project (NYIFUP) to inicjatywa, która wyłoniła się siedem lat temu z badań i rozmów z prawnikami imigracyjnymi oraz obrońcami praw imigrantów. Opiniowali oni, że brak kompetentnej reprezentacji prawnej dla wielu nowojorskich imigrantów, nieznających prawa, nieposiadających pieniędzy na prawników i mających problemy z językiem, oznacza niepotrzebne deportacje, które doprowadzają do rozłąki rodzin i są niepotrzebnym balastem finansowym dla rządu.
Ubiegłego lata nowojorska rada miasta przeznaczyła 500 000 dol. na sfinansowanie pilotażowego programu, którego zadaniem było przetestowanie sensowności inicjatywy. Do projektu włączyła się szkoła prawnicza im. Benjamina N. Cardozo oraz kilka organizacji walczących o prawa imigrantów i tak powstał program pomocy dla 190 imigrantów.
"To jest kwestia sprawiedliwości – mówi Peter L. Markowitz, profesor w Cardozo Law School. – To szansa na zapoczątkowanie zmian w sposobie, w jaki traktowani są imigranci w naszym kraju".
W przyszłości pomysłodawcy NYIFUP planują zorganizować pomoc prawną dla wszystkich niezamożnych imigrantów oczekujących na deportację w więzieniach imigracyjnych: w mieście Nowy Jork, Batavia, NY, Newarku i Elizabeth w New Jersey. Rocznie do tych ośrodków trafia około 2450 imigrantów.
Pełny roczny koszt tego programu szacowany jest na 7,4 miliona dolarów. Jego zwolennicy argumentują, że skrócenie czasu, jaki imigranci spędzają w ośrodkach zatrzymań, oraz ograniczenie liczby deportacji przyniesie oszczędności w wysokości 5,9 miliona rocznie.
Source
JPMorgan Chase Is Funding and Profiting From Private Immigration Prisons
![](/sites/default/files/newsdefault.jpg)
JPMorgan Chase Is Funding and Profiting From Private Immigration Prisons
One of America's largest banks, JPMorgan Chase, is quietly financing the immigration detention centers that have detained an average of 26,240 people per day through July 2017, according to a new ...
One of America's largest banks, JPMorgan Chase, is quietly financing the immigration detention centers that have detained an average of 26,240 people per day through July 2017, according to a new report by the Center for Popular Democracy and Make the Road New York. Through over $100 million loans, lines of credit and bonds, Wall Street has been financially propping up CoreCivic and GeoCorp, America's two largest private immigration detention centers.
Read the full article here.
IDNYC: Fuente de Dignidad para Miles
El Diario - January 30, 2015, by Ana Maria Archila - Se puede palpar la emoción este mes en las comunidades inmigrantes pues los neoyorquinos, incluidos miles de inmigrantes indocumentados...
El Diario - January 30, 2015, by Ana Maria Archila - Se puede palpar la emoción este mes en las comunidades inmigrantes pues los neoyorquinos, incluidos miles de inmigrantes indocumentados deseosos de más acceso e igualdad, acudieron en masa a inscribirse para IDNYC. El éxito del programa es claro, ya que más de 12,000 residentes ya se han inscrito y más de 100,000 otros tienen cita para hacerlo.
Los beneficios de tener tal identificación son básicos, pero la tarjeta de identificación gubernamental es absolutamente necesaria para quienes de lo contrario enfrentarían muchos desafíos en el diario vivir.
Guadalupe Paleta, madre indocumentada y residente de Queens, hizo cita la semana pasada. Con identificación, podrá visitar la escuela de sus hijos sin necesidad de preocuparse. No le molesta tener que esperar unas cuantas semanas para solicitarla. "Esta identificación indica que estamos acá, que nos ven", dijo.
Para las familias inmigrantes como la de Guadalupe, el programa de identificación ofrece mucho más que una tarjeta con foto. Nos dice que, independientemente de nuestra situación, si hemos echado raíces aquí, pertenecemos aquí.
El entusiasmo por IDNYC es enorme. Ante la oportunidad de tener una tarjeta que simboliza su estatus como neoyorquinos, los inmigrantes acudieron en masa. Nuestras familias atestaron oficinas e hicieron largas filas. Fue prueba de la labor hecha por la oficina del alcalde, como también la comunidad –organizaciones de servicio y de activismo, medios de prensa y otros– para informar a los neoyorquinos sobre el programa.
Pero no todos nuestros vecinos tuvieron la sensatez necesaria para darse cuenta del valor histórico y cívico de lo sucedido. Opositores al programa no pudieron resistir la tentación de armar escándalo.
Hicieron que otros en el entorno de comentarios noticiosos cayeran en la trampa de perder la perspectiva y fueran tendenciosos en su opinión sobre el programa.
La indignación y las protestas sobre las fallas del programa provinieron de quienes nunca apoyaron IDNYC, y a muchos nos parecieron poco sinceras. Simplemente no se percataron de la verdadera noticia que se producía ante sus ojos: la ciudad de NY sirve de inspiración al incluir cada vez más a todo tipo de personas.
Sin embargo, este programa es demasiado importante para demasiados neoyorquinos como para convertirse en una serie de golpes editoriales bajos al alcalde.
A todos nos deben alentar y conmover las imágenes de familias inmigrantes que se inscriben para IDNYC. Confirman la importancia de una política municipal dinámica que facilita la inclusión de los inmigrantes.
Para ver el articulo original, haga un clic aqui.
Inmigrantes hispanos sufren más accidentes en las obras, indica estudio
NY1 Noticias – October 24, 2013 -
Un nuevo estudio indica que los trabajadores inmigrantes hispanos son más propensos a morir en trabajos de la construcción.
...
NY1 Noticias – October 24, 2013 -
Un nuevo estudio indica que los trabajadores inmigrantes hispanos son más propensos a morir en trabajos de la construcción.
La investigación, realizada por “Center for Popular Democracy”, que abarca desde los años 2001 a 2011, también señala que la debilitación de la Ley de Andamios de Nueva York, dañaría desproporcionalmente a los inmigrantes y a los afroamericanos.
El estudio halló que los trabajadores latinos del estado de Nueva York se enfrentan a mayores peligros en la construcción que otros grupos.
En Nueva York, el 60% de las víctimas investigadas por caídas desde posiciones elevadas fueron latinas o inmigrantes.
El 74% de estas caídas que resultaron mortales, fueron víctimas latinas.
Un número desproporcionadamente alto, ya que este grupo constituye sólo el 40% de los trabajadores de construcción.
De todos ellos, el 86% de fatalidades fueron de trabajadores sin sindicato.
Además de proteger la Ley de Andamios, el estudio recomienda, para que se eviten lesiones y muertes en el trabajo, la presencia de más inspectores, un entrenamiento más apropiado, y la utilización de equipos cuidadosamente revisados.
Source
Puerto Rico is on Track for Historic Debt Forgiveness -- Unless Wall Street Gets its Way
![](/sites/default/files/newsdefault.jpg)
Puerto Rico is on Track for Historic Debt Forgiveness -- Unless Wall Street Gets its Way
For bondholders sitting on Puerto Rican debt, Hurricane Maria may have come just when they needed it, just as a yearslong battle over the fate of the island’s financial future was beginning to...
For bondholders sitting on Puerto Rican debt, Hurricane Maria may have come just when they needed it, just as a yearslong battle over the fate of the island’s financial future was beginning to turn against them. Or, depending on how the politics shake out, they could see their entire bet go south.
Read the full article here.
As Federal Reserve Selects New Top Officials, Coalition Calls for Public Input
New York Times - November 10, 2014, by Binyamin Appelbaum - A coalition of community...
New York Times - November 10, 2014, by Binyamin Appelbaum - A coalition of community groups and labor unions wants the Federal Reserve to change the way some Fed officials are appointed, criticizing the existing process as secretive, undemocratic and dominated by banks and other large corporations.
In letters sent to Fed officials last week, the coalition called for the central bank to let the public participate in choosing new presidents for the regional reserve banks in Philadelphia and Dallas. The current heads of both banks plan to step down in the first half of 2015.
The Fed’s chairwoman, Janet L. Yellen, has agreed to meet on Friday with about three dozen representatives of the groups to hear their concerns.
“The Federal Reserve has huge influence over the number of people who have jobs, over our wages, over the number of hours that we get to work, and yet we don’t have discussion and engagement over what Fed policy should be,” said Ady Barkan, a lawyer with the Center for Popular Democracy, a Brooklyn-based advocacy group that is orchestrating the campaigns. “More people’s voices need to be heard.”
A spokeswoman for Ms. Yellen confirmed the meeting but declined to comment on the issues raised by the groups.
The Philadelphia Fed said in an email that the institution “is conducting a broad search for its next president and will consider a diverse group of candidates from inside and outside the Federal Reserve System.”
James Hoard, a spokesman for the Dallas Fed, said the bank’s board would meet on Thursday to discuss the search process.
The campaign is part of a broader increase in political pressure on the Fed, which is engaged in a long-running campaign to stimulate the economy that some liberals regard as insufficient and some conservatives see as both ineffective and dangerous. Mr. Barkan led a picket line in support of the Fed’s efforts in August outside the annual monetary policy conference at Jackson Hole, Wyo.
House Republicans, meanwhile, have passed legislation that seeks to reduce the Fed’s flexibility in responding to economic downturns, arguing that such efforts are destabilizing.
The Fed acts like a monolith, but it has a complicated skeleton. Most power rests with a board of governors in Washington, who are nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate. But operations are conducted through 12 regional banks, each of which selects its own president. And those presidents rotate among themselves five of the 12 seats on the Federal Open Market Committee, which sets monetary policy.
The two presidents who have said they plan to step down are, by coincidence, among the most outspoken internal critics of the Fed’s campaign to stimulate the economy. Charles I. Plosser, president of the Philadelphia Fed since 2006, plans to retire at the end of March. Richard W. Fisher, president of the Dallas Fed since 2005, is required to step down by the end of April, though he has not set a date.
Their replacements will be selected by the board of each reserve bank. Each board has nine members, including three bankers, but under the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act, only the nonbank members can participate in the process. The banks in each reserve district, however, still elect three of those six nonbank members. The other three, including the chairman and vice chairman, are appointed by the Fed board in Washington.
By law, the boards are supposed to represent a diverse set of viewpoints, including “labor and consumers.” But the 72 nonbank board members are predominantly corporate executives. Just eight are leaders of community groups; two more are leaders of labor groups.
Corporate executives exclusively make up the boards of the St. Louis and Richmond regional banks. The Dallas Fed’s board includes the presidents of the Houston Endowment — a charitable organization — and the University of Houston. The Philadelphia Fed has five executives and the president of the University of Delaware.
“I look at that list and it doesn’t strike me that most of those folks are representing the public,” Kati Sipp, director of Pennsylvania Working Families, a nonprofit advocacy group that is one of the signatories of the recent letter, said of the Philadelphia Fed’s board. “We believe it is important for the people who are making economic policy to hear from the regular folks on the ground who are being affected by those decisions.”
The two dozen signatories also include the Pennsylvania AFL-CIO, New Jersey Communities United and W. Wilson Goode Jr., a Philadelphia city councilman. The letter asks for the Fed to disclose basic information about the selection process, including the timetable, criteria and, eventually, names of candidates. It also seeks search committee seats and opportunities to question the candidates publicly.
The selection process is secretive, but control has increasingly shifted from the regional banks to the board of governors. Beginning under the leadership of Alan Greenspan, a former Fed chairman, the central bank has sought presidents who can contribute to making monetary policy. The board provides informal guidance during the winnowing process, and candidates travel to Washington to meet with the governors.
As a result of that trend, 10 of the 12 sitting presidents are former Fed staffers, economists or both. Mr. Fisher, a former investor, is one exception. The other is Dennis P. Lockhart, a former banker who leads the Atlanta Fed — and is the next president who will reach retirement age.
Source
The First Time Maria Gallagher Talked About Her Sexual Assault, It Was to Senator Flake
![](/sites/default/files/newsdefault.jpg)
The First Time Maria Gallagher Talked About Her Sexual Assault, It Was to Senator Flake
The Senate Judiciary Committee has officially voted to move Brett Kavanaugh's Supreme Court nomination forward. However, Sen. Jeff Flake has requested an FBI investigation take place before the...
The Senate Judiciary Committee has officially voted to move Brett Kavanaugh's Supreme Court nomination forward. However, Sen. Jeff Flake has requested an FBI investigation take place before the full Senate votes on Kavanaugh's confirmation, something Republican leaders have now agreed to, per The Hill.
Read the article and watch the video here.
City Governments Spend More For Policing Than Social Services
![](/sites/default/files/newsdefault.jpg)
City Governments Spend More For Policing Than Social Services
Watch a discussion about how governments spend more money on policing than they do on social services.
...
Watch a discussion about how governments spend more money on policing than they do on social services.
Watch the video here.
14 hours ago
3 days ago