One Year After Obama’s Executive Order, Immigrants Rally Across Country
One Year After Obama’s Executive Order, Immigrants Rally Across Country
A year ago tomorrow President Obama announced his executive orders to defer deportation for immigrant families by creating Deferred Action for Parents (DAPA) and expanding Deferred Action for...
A year ago tomorrow President Obama announced his executive orders to defer deportation for immigrant families by creating Deferred Action for Parents (DAPA) and expanding Deferred Action for Children (DACA). Since then, the promised reform has been stalled by a politically motivated lawsuit filed in the Fifth Circuit Court by Texas Governor Greg Abbott that left the lives of five million immigrants in limbo.
Tomorrow, immigrants are rallying across the country in support of the executive action. In Texas, immigrant families are on a three-day pilgrimage, which starts today at the Hutto immigrant detention facility in Taylor, Texas, and ends in front of the Texas Governor’s Mansion on November 21 with a rally of thousands. Protestors will call on Governor Abbott to meet with the families he has affected through his opposition to comprehensive immigration reform.
Simultaneously, hundreds of immigrant families will gather at 11.30 a.m. tomorrow November 20 in front of the Supreme Court in Washington D.C. to demand the promised reforms be implemented. Following the Fifth Circuit Court’s decision earlier this month to block the executive orders, the Obama administration is expected to file an appeal to the Supreme Court, which must now decide to hear the case in 2016 before President Obama leaves office.
At 3 p.m. tomorrow, a group of advocates will host a Thanksgiving dinner outside of the Elizabeth Detention Center in New Jersey for the families who have been separated due to detentions and deportations. They will call on the U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement to change its damaging policies toward immigrant families.
"Today is a day to lift up the promise of Obama’s Executive Action and call on all parties to do what they can to see it through. No one can claim to be powerless in this fight. We call on the Supreme Court Justices to take up this case and will work with our partners around the country to bring the stories and passion of immigrant families to the forefront of the discussion. Local cities and states can voice their support, and those state leaders that continue to bait and persecute immigrants, will face steady, mounting protest,” said Shena Elrington, Director of Immigrant Rights & Racial Justice at Center for Popular Democracy.
Jessel Pinzon, a high school student and a Make the Road New York member, who came to the United States in October 2008: “When expanded DACA takes effect, I will be able to have a better job and apply for scholarships to go to college. I will have the opportunity to stay in this country which I consider my home, and where I want to build my future. The Fifth Circuit’s decision came from judges who have shown time after time that they are against our families. Now our fight goes on to the Supreme Court!”
Ehiracenia Vasquez, member of the Texas Organizing Project, which is behind the Texas pilgrimage: “One year ago, when President Obama announced that he was extending deportation relief to parents of citizen and US-born children, my heart sang. Finally, my husband and I would no longer have to live in fear of being separated from our children, from each other. My children wouldn’t have to worry about their parents being taken away from them. It was the answer to our prayers.
“I am frustrated but not discouraged that a year later, Gov. Greg Abbott’s lawsuit has kept us from realizing that dream. I refuse to be discouraged. I have faith that the US Supreme Court will side with our President and DAPA will become a reality for us. I’m ready to apply. I’ve been ready since the President announced it a year ago. And I’m ready to keep fighting.”
# # #
www.populardemocracy.org
The Center for Popular Democracy promotes equity, opportunity, and a dynamic democracy in partnership with innovative base-building organizations, organizing networks and alliances, and progressive unions across the country. CPD builds the strength and capacity of democratic organizations to envision and advance a pro-worker, pro-immigrant, racial justice agenda.
A National Solution
New York Times - June 25, 2014, by Peter Markowitz - For too many years our nation’s discourse around immigration has been distorted by anti-immigrant activists who have advanced bold but...
New York Times - June 25, 2014, by Peter Markowitz - For too many years our nation’s discourse around immigration has been distorted by anti-immigrant activists who have advanced bold but regressive state immigration policies. State laws in Arizona and elsewhere have powerfully, but inaccurately, framed the immigration issue through the lenses of criminality and terrorism. While these laws have not generally fared well in court, their impact on our national perception of immigration has impeded federal immigration reform. Meanwhile, states like New York continue to suffer the consequences of our broken immigration laws. Our families continue to be fractured by a torrent of deportations. Our economic growth continues to be impeded by the barriers our immigrant labor force faces. And our democracy continues to be undermined by the exclusion of a broad class of New York residents.
The New York Is Home Act, recently introduced by New York State Senator Gustavo Rivera and Assembly Member Karim Camara, with support from the Center for Popular Democracy and Make the Road New York, charts a path forward on immigration — a path that like-minded states and ultimately the federal government could follow. The legislation would grant state citizenship to noncitizens who can prove three years of residency and tax payment and who demonstrate a commitment to abiding by state laws and the state constitution.
The bill is an ambitious but sensible assertion of a state’s well-established power to define the bounds of its own political community. Unlike the Arizona law, this legislation is carefully crafted to respect the unique province of the federal government. As misguided and brutal as the federal immigration regime is, New York cannot alter federal deportation policy. However, it is absolutely within New York’s power to facilitate the full inclusion of immigrants in our state. By granting state citizenship, we would extend the full bundle of rights a state can deliver — the right to vote in state elections, to drive, to access higher education, among others — and we would define the full range of responsibilities that come along with citizenship, including tax payment, jury service and respect for state law. By reorienting our national conversation on immigration around the more accurate and productive themes of family, economic vitality and political inclusion, this legislation will move us toward a real solution to our nation’s immigration quagmire.
Source
Fed Up Panels Solve Wage Stagnation Puzzle: Corporate Power Makes Markets Uncompetitive
09.23.2018
JACKSON HOLE, WY — Today, experts on our economy came together in Jackson Hole, Wyoming to...
09.23.2018
JACKSON HOLE, WY — Today, experts on our economy came together in Jackson Hole, Wyoming to talk about how market power keeps wages down and what the Federal Reserve can do to address it. Though Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell said the reason for stagnant wages was “a puzzle.”
The panel, called “Putting the Puzzle Together: How Market Concentration Explains Slow Wage Growth and What the Fed Can Do About it” was organized by Fed Up. Panelists, including Roosevelt Institute Research Director and Fellow Marshall Steinbaum, Open Markets Institute Policy Counsel Sandeep Vaheesan, retail worker Nick Gallant, and labor studies and employment relations doctoral student Phela Townsend, discussed how an analysis of the role of market power in our economy would shift the Federal Reserve’s directive.
This year, the theme of the Federal Reserve’s economic symposium is “Changing Market Structure and Implications for Monetary Policy.” According to panelists, market consolidation means that the Fed needs to fundamentally shift the assumptions on which their monetary policy models rest.
Setting the scene for the panel, Fed Up Campaign Director Shawn Sebastian said, “The reason for stagnant wages is actually not a hard puzzle to solve. The data is right in front of us. The difficulty for the Fed is not in figuring out what the impact of increased market power is on wages -- consolidation keeps wages low by decreasing worker power. What’s hard for the Fed is giving up outdated frameworks from the 1980s that are not relevant to the economy today.”
Retail worker Nick Gallant spoke about his experience as a retail worker. He said:
“I can’t go to school because I have no control over my schedule and I need to work full time to pay rent and survive. I live on paycheck to paycheck and sometimes I don’t have enough money to buy bare necessities and I have to come up with creative ways to eat because desperate times call for desperate measures. If I left this job, I would simply be looking at another job like this. This is being a retail worker in America.”
Economic policy and labor experts added:
“When the economy grows, it doesn’t benefit everyone -- only major shareholders and CEOs,” said Marshall Steinbaum, Research Director and Fellow at the Roosevelt Institute. “Market power makes the economy grow less because companies don’t invest or hire workers. They pay out to the wealthiest stakeholders. And with fewer corporations dominating labor markets, they are able to keep wages down.”
“The economy is a construct of law and politics,” said Sandeep Vaheesan, Policy Counsel at the Open Markets Institute. “Our current predicament wasn’t inevitable -- it is the result of decades of prioritizing corporate and investor interests over those of working people. This is far from a puzzle. It’s straightforward decision making by those in power -- and these choices can be changed. In understanding the economy and making decisions on monetary and regulatory policy, the Fed needs to realize that markets just plain aren’t competitive but defined by employer power and worker weakness. They need models that reflect our economic reality.”
“This is not really new. As we look at the trajectory of what has happened in recent decades and what has happened to wages historically, we are really talking about how workers’ power has been weakened through the decline of unions and the erosion of other workers protections and rights. This has severely diminished workers’ ability to have a voice and a say over economic and other working conditions, or to find a job elsewhere with better conditions,” said Phela Townsend, doctoral student in Labor Studies and Employment Relations at the School of Management and Labor Relations at Rutgers-New Brunswick. “Unleashed corporate power, on top of weakened worker power, silences workers and keeps them from advocating for the wages that many of them need to survive.”
The panel comes the day before the Federal Reserve hosts a number of panels on the subject of market power. During the economic symposium, working people from across the country will host educational sessions and discuss how the Federal Reserve has ignored the needs of working people.
You can access a recording of the panel here.
###
Media Contact: Lia Weintraub, lweintraub@populardemocracy.org
National Day of Action to Reclaim Public Education in Over 60 Cities
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
December 9, 2013
Contact: Kyle Serrette,...
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: December 9, 2013
Contact: Kyle Serrette, Center for Popular Democracy (202) 304-8027, kyle@commongoodcenter.org
Thousands of Parents, Students & Teachers Join National Day of Action in Over 60 Cities Call for New Direction in Education Reform
On Dec. 9, a coalition of parents, students and teachers across the country participated in a National Day of Action to Reclaim the Promise of Public Education. At town hall events, marches and rallies in over 60 cities they demanded a new direction in education reform, one that ends inequities, closes opportunity gaps, and ensures every child has the resources and opportunities to succeed.
For too long, education policy has been dominated by top-down mandates, high-stakes testing, mass school closures and a mantra of "no excuses" that disregards the impact of inequality, and austerity on students' opportunities to learn.
The Day of Action charts a new way forward to ensure excellent neighborhood schools for all children. Needed reforms include fair school funding, universal early education, wraparound services to meet students' academic, social and health needs, and support for teachers.
Public schools form the backbone of our democracy and ensure the country’s long-term economic success. For our schools to remain a robust public institution capable of meeting the needs of all children, policymakers must incorporate the voices of parents, students, communities and teachers in their decision-making.
The Day of Action grew out of an October conference in Los Angeles that was hosted in partnership by the National Opportunity to Learn Campaign, American Federation of Teachers, National Education Association, and Communities for Public Education Reform. The new coalition of parents, students, teachers, labor and community groups that emerged developed the Principles That Unite Us, a guiding document that serves as blueprint for a new vision of education reform.
As part of the Day of Action, coalition members are asking individuals and organizations to sign on to the Principles That Unite Us and to sign a petition asking policymakers to endorse the document.
A partial list of Day of Action events and media coverage is available at www.ReclaimPublicEd.org.
“Our communities have felt the pain of the disinvestment in public education for many years and we have fought to preserve it,” said Kyle Serrette, Director of Education for the Center for Popular Democracy. “Today, we are excited to intensify our struggle and build the power we will need to win.”
"This is a pivotal moment in public education across the nation and in New York. For too long, students have seen classes eliminated, resources dwindle and teachers cut. Compounded by excessive testing, New York’s students are missing out on the vital opportunities that are crucial for college and career success," said Billy Easton, Executive Director of the Alliance for Quality Education (AQE) in New York. "On Monday, AQE - in partnership with NYSUT, Citizen Action of NY, UFT & others - will be hosting events across the state to highlight the crisis our public schools are facing and uplift the solutions to get NY back on track to providing every student with a sound basic education."
"In Chicago, hundreds will deliver signed Holiday Cards stating 'What Chicago School Children want for the Holidays' to the Aldermen who have not supported the community in pushing for the City to declare a TIF Surplus to help reverse the severe budget cuts to neighborhood schools this year," said representatives from the Albany Park Neighborhood Council in Chicago. "Governor Quinn will also receive a wish list from parents, students, and community members on the need for an Elected Representative School Board and a stop on charter expansion when neighborhood schools are not being adequately funded."
“The OTL Campaign is proud to stand with parents and young people across the country as they work with teachers and community members to reclaim public education,” said John H. Jackson, President and CEO of the Schott Foundation for Public Education, which is the OTL Campaign’s parent organization. “It is time for our country to shift from standards-based reform to policies that ensure every student has access to the resources and supports they need.”
For more information on the National Day of Action, visit www.ReclaimPublicEdNow.org or contact Kyle Serrette at (202) 304-8027.
National organizations sponsoring the Day of Action include: Alliance for Educational Justice (AEJ) American Federation of Teachers (AFT) Annenberg Institute for School Reform Center for Popular Democracy Dignity in Schools Coalition Gamaliel Network Journey for Justice Alliance (J4J) Leadership Center for the Common Good League of United Latin American Citizens National Education Association (NEA) National Opportunity to Learn (OTL) Campaign Service Employees International Union
Ilhan Omar Romps In Minneapolis Democratic Primary, While Tim Walz And Keith Ellison Win Statewide
Ilhan Omar Romps In Minneapolis Democratic Primary, While Tim Walz And Keith Ellison Win Statewide
Omar had the backing of the bulk of the progressive and grassroots groups that weighed in on the race, including MoveOn; Justice Democrats; the statewide and Twin Cities chapters of Our Revolution...
Omar had the backing of the bulk of the progressive and grassroots groups that weighed in on the race, including MoveOn; Justice Democrats; the statewide and Twin Cities chapters of Our Revolution, the group that was formed from the remnants of the 2016 Bernie Sanders campaign; and CPD Action, an arm of the Center for Popular Democracy.
Read the full article here.
Dr. Martin Luther King Day -- New York City Rally Today Against Trump’s Racist “Shithole” comment
Dr. Martin Luther King Day -- New York City Rally Today Against Trump’s Racist “Shithole” comment
A coalition including 1199SEIU, the Haitian Round Table, National Action Network, Women’s March, New York State Nurses Association, District Council 37 AFSCME, 32BJ SEIU, American Federation of...
A coalition including 1199SEIU, the Haitian Round Table, National Action Network, Women’s March, New York State Nurses Association, District Council 37 AFSCME, 32BJ SEIU, American Federation of Teachers, United Federation of Teachers, New York City Central Labor Council, AFL-CIO, RWDSU, New York Immigration Coalition, Haitian-American Business Network, Yemeni American Merchants Association, United African Congress, Northern Manhattan Coalition for Immigrant Rights, National Alliance for Advancement of Haitian Professionals, Association of Haitian and American Engineers, HEALHaiti, Arab American Association of New York, Black Alliance for Just Immigration, Center for Popular Democracy, Make the Road New York, Immigration Equality, LIFE Camp,Inc., MPower, Desis Rising Up & Moving, Adhikaar, Haiti Cultural Exchange, Haitian American Lawyers Association, and the Working Families Party.
Read the full article here.
Seattle Unanimously Passes an 'Amazon Tax' to Fund Affordable Housing
Seattle Unanimously Passes an 'Amazon Tax' to Fund Affordable Housing
Nearly 40 elected city officials from all corners of the U.S., including from metros bracing for Amazon HQ2 like Boston, Chicago, Denver, Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, and Washington, D.C.,...
Nearly 40 elected city officials from all corners of the U.S., including from metros bracing for Amazon HQ2 like Boston, Chicago, Denver, Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, and Washington, D.C., signed an open letter on Monday urging Seattle City Council to stay the course and criticizing Amazon’s tactics during the head tax debate.” “This is particularly concerning to us given Amazon’s approach to the competition for HQ2, in which the company has promoted a bidding war of jurisdictions competing with each other to offer greater incentive packages,” the letter read. “If Amazon were serious about its support for strong affordable housing solutions, it would fully back this tax proposal and chip in to help address Seattle’s homelessness crisis. By threatening Seattle over this tax, Amazon is sending a message to all of our cities: We play by our own rules.”
Read the full article here.
Nueva York es la primera ciudad de EE.UU. que financia abogados para inmigrantes
NTN24 – July 21, 2013 - Una investigación determinó que las personas que se encuentran bajo detención por orden de un juez de inmigración en EE.UU. no cuentan con un abogado de oficio.
Por...
NTN24 – July 21, 2013 - Una investigación determinó que las personas que se encuentran bajo detención por orden de un juez de inmigración en EE.UU. no cuentan con un abogado de oficio.
Por esta razón, se creó en Nueva York un programa que le brinda el acompañamiento legal a los inmigrantes que no cuentan con los recursos necesarios para recibir asesoría legal. La iniciativa es apoyada por Robert Katzmann, Juez federal de la Corte de Apelaciones.
Source
Fed official explains why he stopped trying to predict the future
Fed official explains why he stopped trying to predict the future
JACKSON HOLE, WYO. -- The world's economic elite gathered here for an annual symposium sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City last week to debate the strategies central banks should...
JACKSON HOLE, WYO. -- The world's economic elite gathered here for an annual symposium sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City last week to debate the strategies central banks should employ to safeguard the global economy. We sat down with St. Louis Fed President James Bullard to chat about when he might be ready for a rate hike, the limits of his powers and why predicting the future is futile.
The transcript below has been edited for length and clarity.
Wonkblog: Let’s start with the question of the day: Which month looks good to you for a rate hike?
Bullard: Actually, I’m agnostic on this. Our new framework calls for one, and only one, and then we go on pause for a bit. It’s not critical to me exactly when we make that move, so we wouldn’t have to go at any particular meeting.
I do like to move on good news, so if we have good information, and we’re at a meeting, it might be a good opportunity to go ahead and make that move. But what’s different about what I’m saying is I’ve got a real flat interest rate path — much closer to the markets’ interest rate path. I don’t have this march upward of 200 or 250 basis points.
If only one more rate hike is really needed to get to the Fed’s neutral stance, why does it matter if you move in September, December or next year? You would be willing to wait until 2017?
Certainly, I just don’t feel that there’s any urgency when you’ve got the framework I’m talking about.
[The Federal Reserve is debating how to fight the next recession]
So explain your framework for us.
What we wanted to do is break down this idea that we’re really certain about where the economy is going in the medium- and long-run. What most models do is they have something called a steady state, which is really an average of all the variables in the past: You look at the unemployment rate, and you take the average unemployment rate. You look at interest rates and take the average past interest rate. You look at inflation, growth — you take averages of the past, and you call those your normal values.
As you go along, you expect all your variables to go back to their normal values. That’s what we’ve been doing. That’s the old framework. And what we’re saying is we don’t like that framework anymore because it suggests we have a lot more certainty about where the economy is going than we really do.
These averages of these variables from the past — they can sometimes be high and sometime be low. You can be in a configuration where these things are low, and then you can switch to another configuration when they’re high. Then they’re high for a while, and you switch back to low. What you have to do is make policy given whatever regime you’re in.
We think that the regime that is dominant right now is a slow-growth regime that is characterized by low productivity growth and very low real returns on short-term government debt around the world. We think these regimes are persistent. These things aren’t changing any time soon. And because of that, we just have to take them as given, for now anyway.
Given that in this framework, it’s difficult to tell when the regime is shifted, how do you know that you’re not setting monetary policy for a regime that’s already expired?
You’re gonna know when the regime switches. These very low real rates of return on government debt, if you look at the ex-post return on one-year Treasurys, it’s about -135 basis points right now. If that starts to go up rapidly, we’re gonna know and we’re going to take note of it. We’re gonna say, “Aha! Our regime has changed, and we’re going to have to change monetary policy accordingly.”
But for forecasting purposes, I wouldn’t say that I’m expecting that to happen all of a sudden. It’s been that way for at least the last three years, and if you look at real rates of return, they’ve declined for the last 30 years. It’s also very clear that we’re in a very low productivity environment.
It’s not that you go to sleep. You stay alert to the possibility that the regime can change in the future, and probably will change at some point in the future. It’s just not good to be predicting that it’s going to change.
Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen's speech here laid out the argument that the Fed is not out of ammunition to fight the next recession. Do you agree with that?
I loved the speech. She made the case that we still have quite a bit of bandwidth to handle problems if they arise in the next couple of years, and I very much agree with that. But at the same time, it’s always good to be studying other possibilities. I actually have papers on nominal GDP targeting, so I think that’s an interesting topic. It's probably not ready for prime time, but I’m a believer in research.
What led you to the support for this regime-based framework. Can you talk about the evolution of your thinking?
Maybe some frustration with the dot plot. We were saying we were going to have to raise rates fairly aggressively over the forecast horizon in order to keep the economy on track, and that wasn’t materializing. We had that forecast for several years, and it wasn’t really working. For that reason, I wanted to get a different way to think about what we were doing.
We’ve only moved once on the policy rate, and markets are saying maybe one more move this year. That would only be one move per year — that’s really not normalization. If you’re going to say it’s going to take 10 years to get back to a normal value, you’re really saying we’re not going back there. That’s way longer than any sort of business cycle than you can reasonably talk about.
How do you feel about the division between monetary and fiscal policy currently? Do you feel it’s time to pass the baton here?
I do think that. And I think the regime framework is good for laying that out for people. Part of the story is that the recession has been over for seven years. The unemployment rate has gone down below 5 percent. Inflation is low, but we don’t think it’s that low, and it’s kind of coming up to target.
So the cyclical dynamics are all done. The dust has settled, I guess is the way I would put it.
You might say the dust has settled, and I don’t like what I see. But for that, you can’t solve that with monetary policy. You’ve got to have things that are going to increase productivity in the economy. You’ve got to make the economy more efficient. New ideas, better technology, better diffusion of technology, better human capital, better skills match — I think it’s a lot of small things that you have to do right to get an economy humming. The story of let’s keep interest rates low and that will help us, that’s kind of over for now.
Related to that are the demonstrations by Fed Up and the Center for Popular Democracy that were held Thursday. Any additional thoughts on their point of view, that there’s still more that the Fed can do?
I love the people that come here. I think they’re a really great slice of the American workforce. It’s really nice that they’re willing to take time out of their lives to come out here and talk to us boring central bankers.
They want to talk about low nominal interest rates as solving difficult problems of how our labor markets operate and how our labor markets are unfair to many people. I would like them to think about the German labor market reforms that were done over the last decade. Germany had very high unemployment for a long time. It was an endemic problem, and then they did these reforms and got their unemployment rate cut in half — even though Europe went through a double-dip recession during that period.
It showed to me that there are ways to attack these problems, and I think we could do that in the U.S. I think they should refocus their efforts on the labor secretary, so we could get those kinds of reforms going. People aren’t even talking about that.
By Ylan Q. Mui
Source
If Janet Yellen Goes, the Fed’s Current Policy May Go With Her
If Janet Yellen Goes, the Fed’s Current Policy May Go With Her
GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK, Wyo. — Liberal activists who stage an annual protest in favor of lower interest rates at the Federal Reserve’s annual conference here are planning a different kind of...
GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK, Wyo. — Liberal activists who stage an annual protest in favor of lower interest rates at the Federal Reserve’s annual conference here are planning a different kind of demonstration this year. They plan to don “Yellen wigs” on Friday to demonstrate in support of Janet L. Yellen, the Fed chairwoman, whose first term ends in February.
President Trump must soon decide whether to renominate Ms. Yellen or pick someone similarly inclined to emphasize economic growth. Or, instead, he could accede to the wishes of many conservatives for a Fed chairman more worried about inflation.
Read the full article here.
4 days ago
4 days ago